Back to comparison

Crowdpear Review

B · 7.0
Best forSecured property loans
ECSP-licensedAudited financialsShort track record
Visit platform
10.6 %
Avg. net return p.a.
2023
Founded
medium-high
Risk profile

Rating in detail

Data coverage: moderate · As of 18 Jul 2026
Safety & regulation30 %
7.0
Transparency25 %
8.0
Track record & stability20 %
6.0
Returns & terms15 %
7.0
Investor experience & liquidity10 %
6.0

How we rate

Our take

Crowdpear is the regulated property arm of the team behind PeerBerry: from €100, investors fund property-backed business loans and receive quarterly interest in return. P2P-Investments.de rates Crowdpear B (7.0/10) - above average for our field. The reasons: a genuine EU licence, audited and profitable financials, and first-ranking mortgages as security. What caps the grade is the short track record - the platform has only been on the market since January 2023 and has not lived through a real downturn. How we arrive at this assessment is set out in our rating methodology.

What is Crowdpear and who is the platform for?

Crowdpear is a Lithuanian crowdfunding platform for property-backed business loans: companies finance construction and bridge projects through the platform, and the borrowed sum is secured by a first-ranking mortgage on the underlying property. You invest from €100 per project, interest averages around 10.6% and is paid quarterly. A secondary market for early exit is available, but there is no auto-invest - you pick every investment yourself.

The platform is mainly interesting for investors who want to add secured property loans from a regulated platform and value audited financials. Anyone looking for broad, automated diversification across hundreds of loans is less well served here: the supply is deliberately curated and at times scarce.

How does Crowdpear work?

Crowdpear does not issue its own loans, nor does it work with a broad network of external loan originators like a classic marketplace. Instead, the platform vets individual property projects, lists them, and pools the capital of many investors into a single loan to the project developer. Legally you acquire an assigned claim from that loan - not a direct loan and not co-ownership of the property. As an ECSP provider, Crowdpear must hold investor money separately from its own operating assets; the investment is not, however, covered by deposit insurance.

The decisive difference from many Baltic P2P platforms: there is no buyback guarantee. Under Lithuanian ECSP supervision such "guarantees" are not permitted, because they suggest a level of safety that in fact hinges on the solvency of a single guarantor. In their place stands a first-ranking mortgage on the financed property: if a loan defaults, the security is realised and the proceeds flow to investors first. The average loan-to-value is around 58% according to the platform, and new loans go up to a maximum of 80% LTV - so there is an equity buffer from the borrower between the loan and any drop in the property's value. First-ranking means that in a recovery, Crowdpear investors are paid from the proceeds ahead of junior creditors - a real advantage over unsecured consumer loans. The catch remains: realisation takes time, and how much a Lithuanian project property is really worth in a downturn has not yet had to be proven for lack of a crisis.

The second distinctive feature is its origin: Crowdpear comes out of the PeerBerry and Aventus-group orbit, but was set up as a separate, ECSP-licensed company. That brings an experienced team - but also creates a concentration risk we return to below.

What kind of loans does Crowdpear have?

The platform lists almost exclusively property projects in Lithuania - predominantly construction and development finance plus bridge loans to smaller project developers, averaging around €93,000 per loan. Terms are mostly 12 to 18 months with a bullet repayment, and interest is paid quarterly. Every project is secured by a first-ranking mortgage, and the terms (interest, LTV, maturity, property) are shown transparently in the project data sheet before you invest.

A typical offer looks like this: a residential or commercial build in or around Vilnius, a term of 12 to 18 months, interest in the region of 10 to 12%, secured by a first-ranking mortgage on the land and the structure, with a loan-to-value usually below 70%. Anyone who subscribes to a project ties their capital specifically to a single, named property - unlike a pool model that blends many loans together. That increases control, but it also means you have to spread across several projects yourself.

Detail view of a Crowdpear loan project showing interest rate, term, loan-to-value, and property description
Example of a single Crowdpear loan project with interest rate, term, LTV, and property details.

One point many users mention: the loan supply is limited. Because Crowdpear vets each project individually and curates deliberately, good projects are often fully funded quickly - fresh capital then sits uninvested on your account for a while (cash drag). Building broad diversification across many loans takes more patience here than on a large marketplace.

Crowdpear project marketplace listing available loan projects with interest rate, term, and loan-to-value
The Crowdpear primary market: available loan projects at a glance, each with interest rate, term, and LTV.

How we rate Crowdpear

Crowdpear scores highest on transparency and most cautiously on track record - no contradiction, but the state of a still-young yet cleanly run platform. In detail (as of July 2026):

Security & regulation (7/10). UAB Crowdpear holds an ECSP licence verifiable in the Bank of Lithuania register (company code 305888586, granted July 2023). The loans are secured by first-ranking mortgages on Lithuanian property, with an average loan-to-value of around 58%. Investor funds are held separately. What holds the score back: there is no buyback guarantee, the project developers' own stake is not disclosed in figures, and the value of the collateral has not been tested in a real property downturn.

Transparency (8/10). This is the clear strength. Crowdpear publishes audited financial statements - something many Baltic P2P platforms lack - and reports volume, average return, LTV, recovery rate and the default rate per vintage on a public statistics page. Owners and management are known by name, and the fee model is clear. The public dashboard even breaks the whole loan book down by status - of the €50.8 million funded so far, around 58% is already repaid and just 0.57% is late, with a further 4.52% in active recovery. What is missing for a top mark is mainly the depth of detail per project and simply more history.

Crowdpear portfolio statistics breakdown: of €50,844,050 funded, 58.02% repaid, 36.9% current, 0.57% late and 4.52% in recovery
Crowdpear's public loan-book breakdown: 58% of the €50.8 million funded is already repaid, 36.9% is current and just 0.57% is late, with 4.52% in active recovery (as of July 2026).

Track record & stability (6/10). Crowdpear has been active with investor money since January 2023 - around three and a half years, €50.8 million funded cumulatively, just over 11,000 investors. The operating company was profitable early on (2024 audited net profit €152,126), and no investor has lost capital so far; even the weaker 2023 vintage (8% default rate) was absorbed by realising the collateral. That is a solid start - but a start. A full cycle as a stress test is still to come.

Return & terms (7/10). The realised average return of 10.6% is appropriate on a risk-adjusted basis for first-ranking mortgage-secured property loans - no conspicuous high yield that would be a warning sign. The advertised "up to 14%" marks the top end of individual projects, not the average. The primary market is free of charge; noticeable are the 15% Lithuanian withholding tax (generally creditable in Germany) and the periodic cash drag. How return and risk relate in P2P is put in context by our knowledge article returns and risks of P2P loans.

Investor-friendliness & liquidity (6/10). The low minimum of €100 and an available secondary market (2% selling fee) speak for the platform. Working against it are the absence of auto-invest - every investment is manual - the largely English-only interface, and the periodically scarce loan supply that makes broad diversification harder.

Data quality and open questions

The biggest open question about Crowdpear is not the regulation or the numbers - those are well documented - but the practical test of its security model in a real property downturn. In total, 16 of 25 assessment questions could be answered from robust sources (supervisory register, audited statements, platform statistics), data quality: medium. Besides the outstanding downturn test, the project developers' stated own stake and the depth of default and recovery data per project remain open. We will revisit these points at the next update.

Crowdpear experiences from the P2P community

Crowdpear is a smaller, still-young platform - the echo in the forums is correspondingly modest, but present. On P2P Dash, around 80 investors link their real portfolios; the median net return (XIRR) tracked across 62 evaluated portfolios sits at about 11.9%, even above the 10.6% average the platform reports. The reported median cash drag of around 3.3% matches what investors describe as scarce supply.

Three things are praised above all: the clear regulation including audited statements, the smooth repayment including successful realisation on the few problem loans, and the simple, tidy interface. Criticised regularly are the limited project supply (and hence the cash drag), the missing auto-invest, and the Lithuanian withholding tax that eats into net returns.

On balance, the community paints the same picture as our analysis: a soundly run, transparent platform with solid returns, whose biggest everyday weakness is the scarce supply - and whose biggest open question remains the still-outstanding practical test in a downturn. Individual experience reports, however, are no proof of reliable returns and replace neither broad diversification nor your own checks.

Who is Crowdpear for?

Crowdpear suits investors who want to add secured property loans from a regulated platform on purpose and appreciate audited financials. Anyone willing to pick projects themselves and live with a periodically scarce supply gets a regulated, well-documented offering with real collateral here. The platform is less suited to beginners looking for automated all-round diversification via auto-invest, or to investors who want to deploy a lot of capital quickly.

Two things are worth seeing realistically. First, the short history: the record so far is clean, but a real property downturn as a stress test is still to come - so better to start small and build the position over time. Second, the close tie to PeerBerry and Aventus: putting money into both platforms diversifies less than the two brand names suggest. P2P remains a risk investment - invest only capital whose loss you can absorb, and spread it across several providers. What that looks like in practice is shown in our knowledge article on diversifying P2P loans; the basics are explained in P2P lending basics.

If you are looking for a regulated, secured property allocation, you can try Crowdpear via the investment link with a small amount first and check the offering yourself before committing more capital. Through P2P-Investments.de there is a €20 bonus for your first investment of €300 or more within 30 days. How the platform fits into the wider market is shown in the platform overview.

Strengths

  • ECSP licence from the Bank of Lithuania; first-ranking mortgage-secured property loans at an average loan-to-value of around 58%
  • Publishes audited and profitable financial statements (2024 net profit €152,126) - rare in P2P; no capital loss for investors so far
  • Low minimum investment from €100, secondary market available, around 10.6% realised average return

Weaknesses

  • Short track record (only since January 2023) - has not been through a full property or interest-rate cycle
  • No auto-invest, a largely English-only interface and periodically scarce loan supply (cash drag)
  • No buyback guarantee; close personnel and ownership ties to PeerBerry and the Aventus group (concentration risk); 15% Lithuanian withholding tax

Risk profile: medium-high

Suitable as a satellite within a broadly diversified portfolio. Invest only part of your capital and diversify across several platforms. The content on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Is Crowdpear legit and regulated?

Crowdpear is operated by UAB Crowdpear and has held a crowdfunding service provider licence (ECSP) from the Bank of Lithuania since 25 July 2023 (company code 305888586, authorisation code LB002204). The licence is valid EU-wide and verifiable in the supervisory register; no public incidents or sanctions are known. Crowdpear also publishes audited financial statements - the exception rather than the rule among P2P platforms.

What return is realistic on Crowdpear?

The platform's own average return is around 10.6% p.a.; up to 14% is advertised. Returns tracked by investors on P2P Dash sit at around 11.9% median. So roughly 10-12% before tax is realistic - correspondingly less after the 15% Lithuanian withholding tax and periodic cash drag from limited loan supply.

What security does Crowdpear offer - and is there a buyback guarantee?

There is no buyback guarantee; under Lithuanian ECSP supervision such guarantees are not permitted. Instead, the loans are secured by first-ranking mortgages on Lithuanian property, at an average loan-to-value of around 58% (maximum 80%). If a loan defaults, the property serves as security - a buffer that has absorbed every default without investor loss so far, but has not yet been tested in a real downturn.

What are the risks of Crowdpear?

The core risk is the short track record: Crowdpear has only been active since January 2023 and has not been through a full property or interest-rate cycle. Without a buyback guarantee, protection rests entirely on the value of the property collateral. On top of that comes a key-person and concentration risk: management and ownership overlap heavily with PeerBerry and the Aventus group, and the focus is on Lithuanian property projects.

What taxes and fees apply on Crowdpear?

The primary market is free of charge; selling on the secondary market costs 2% of face value, while buyers pay nothing. Lithuania withholds 15% tax on the interest income of non-Lithuanian private investors; under the Germany-Lithuania double tax treaty the rate can be reduced to 10% with a certificate of residence and the DAS-1 form, and the withholding tax paid is generally creditable against German capital-gains tax. Our knowledge article on taxes on P2P loans explains how this works in practice.

How can I reduce the Lithuanian withholding tax on Crowdpear?

At login, Crowdpear notes that the withholding tax can be reduced under a double tax treaty - for investors who are tax residents of Germany, the Germany-Lithuania treaty applies. You obtain a certificate of residence from your tax office and submit it together with the Lithuanian DAS-1 form; this cuts the amount withheld from 15% to 10%. For German investors this is not a full exemption - the remaining 10% stays, but it is generally creditable against German capital-gains tax, so you are not taxed twice. Timing matters: file the certificate before the first interest is paid, otherwise reclaiming over-withheld tax directly in Lithuania is a hassle. Our knowledge article on taxes on P2P loans sets out the individual steps.

Crowdpear vs. Mintos - which platform is better?

The difference is above all one of investment philosophy. On Mintos you diversify automatically across thousands of consumer loans from many originators - MiFID II-licensed, with auto-invest and around 11% return, but mostly unsecured. Crowdpear takes the opposite route: a few hand-picked property projects that you select yourself, each secured by a first-ranking mortgage and yielding around 10.6%. Mintos wins on breadth and automation, Crowdpear on collateral and audited financials. For most beginners Mintos is the easier start; anyone who wants to add secured single projects deliberately and does not mind the manual effort is in the right place with Crowdpear. Compare directly in the platform overview.

Crowdpear vs. InRento - which P2P property platform is better?

Both are ECSP-licensed Lithuanian property platforms with first-ranking mortgages and no buyback. Crowdpear (since 2023) funds property-backed business loans from €100, publishes audited, profitable statements and offers a secondary market, but no auto-invest. InRento (since 2020) specialises in tenanted buy-to-let properties with monthly rental income, but has a higher minimum (€500) and no audited statement. If you prioritise the lower entry point and audited financials, Crowdpear is the better fit; if you want ongoing rental income, InRento is. More in the platform overview.

How are Crowdpear and PeerBerry connected?

Crowdpear is a spin-off from the PeerBerry orbit: two of the three shareholders also hold stakes in PeerBerry, the third is connected to the Aventus group, and Crowdpear's deputy CEO Arūnas Lekavičius is also PeerBerry's CEO. The two platforms were deliberately kept separate, though, because they serve different business models: PeerBerry brokers short-term consumer loans with a buyback guarantee, Crowdpear property-backed business loans under its own ECSP licence. For investors, the close ties mean one thing above all: putting money into both platforms diversifies less than the two brand names suggest.